Monday, February 28, 2011

How Talk Talk spoke to today's artists

Often overlooked in favour of their contemporaries, Mark Hollis and co were one of the most influential English bands of the 80s

In his weighty 2010 tome Electric Eden: Unearthing Britain's Visionary Music, Rob Young charted a century's worth of musicians who helped define British folk. In the latter stages he rightly identifies and aligns the often-overlooked Talk Talk with the likes of Kate Bush and Julian Cope as genuine outsiders whose music belongs to a deep-rooted British tradition ? artists who "sought to kick their way free of expectations and create hybrid, idiosyncratic sound environments ... [to] maintain a distinctively British voice".

It was a reminder of a band who, though they may have slipped from public consciousness in the two decades since their split, are being felt more as an influence than ever. Talk Talk are one of a few genuine pioneers of their era not to have succumbed to the oxymoronically named Don't Look Back reunion circuit. Though their name may now be more synonymous with a broadband package, there was time ? the 80s ? when Talk Talk were surging forward into experimental new territories. This is also a band who divide opinion and remain nigh-on impossible to categorise; canvassing opinions online this week, retrospective reactions ranged from "Amazing!" to "Humourless, wafty and loved only by Balearic DJs".

A reminder of such influence came via an unlikely source in 2003, when Gwen Stefani's Californian ska-pop crew No Doubt scored a chart hit with a fairly faithful cover of It's My Life. But the band's influence is most obviously evident in the output of Wild Beasts. Like Talk Talk, Wild Beasts are an inherently English band preoccupied with the possibilities of space and atmospherics (and falsetto) in their sounds. "All the best bands change shape," says Wild Beast's Benny Little of their love of Talk Talk, ahead of the Beasts' new album, Smother, released in May. "The best parts are unquantifiable," agrees bassist/singer Hayden Thorpe.

A rarity in the 80s pop milieu, Talk Talk treated pop not as a shallow medium through which to get laid/rich/a sports car but, thanks mainly to frontman Mark Hollis, a conduit through which to explore uncharted waters, often in painstakingly detailed production. And unlike contemporaries such as Scritti Politti, who went from politicised squat-dwelling post-punk to lightweight winebar soul music of the mid-80s, Talk Talk went in the opposite direction: from new romantic synthpop to the avant garde by way of chart success.

Though EMI had hopes for them to follow the success of tourmates Duran Duran, Hollis was less inspired by the staple early-80s influences of Bowie and/or punk that had gone before and instead preferred everything from Satie to the Seeds to the modal jazz of Miles Davis. This was cerebral pop that refused to stand still, and as the decade progressed ? and producer/keyboard player Tim Friese-Greene joined ? Talk Talk released a series of wilfully diverse records that drew on jazz, classical, folk and pop without falling strongly to any one camp.

With its rolling piano riff, 1985's Life's What You Make It remains their best known song and has since been covered by various people (including Weezer). The success of the subsequent 1986 album Colour of Spring gained them enough commercial success for EMI to stump a hefty budget for their next album. Retreating to a church in Suffolk, Talk Talk lost themselves in their music, overshooting all deadlines and budgets. The result was 1988's Spirit of Eden, now considered a classic, albeit one that was initially commercially unsuccessful.

The influence of the layered texturing (the close-miking of individual instruments ensured an air of intimacy) and ambient leanings of the album is now evident in a disparate array of artists: from the post-rock of Tortoise and others that emerged in the 90s to associated Talk Talk bands such as Bark Psychosis and Catherine Wheel, through the trip-hop of Portishead, DJ Shadow and Unkle (whose 1998 debut Hollis played on) to the vocal fragility of Antony and the Johnsons and the natural world references of British Sea Power, finally arriving at latter-day Radiohead ? and Wild Beasts.

There's always something reassuring about a band whose ending really is a full stop; this way, there is no opportunity to taint the legacy. Hollis retired from music in the late-90s ? explaining: "I can't go on tour and be a good dad at the same time" ? and has shown little wish to return. Perhaps the best thing he can do is sit back and watch as the small shoots that he helped plant now blossom in strange new forms.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2011/feb/28/talk-talk-mark-hollis

Dido Joss Stone Majandra Delfino Maria Bello Jennifer Gareis

Ron Paul and Herman Cain: Tea Party 2012 Dream Team

Over the weekend, the Tea Party Patriots held its first national "policy summit" in Phoenix, Arizona. The nation's largest tea party umbrella organization managed to get about 1,600 activists to show up at the Phoenix convention center to hear from a line up of B-list pundits (Dick Morris), no-name right wing pseudo-academics, and a handful of Congress's most out-there members (Rep. Louie "terror babies" Gohmert (R-Texas)). At the last minute, TPP managed to snag presidential contender and former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, who, according to Politico, gave a firey speech calling on tea partiers to "rise up" against the union-coddling Obama administration.

But Pawlenty's speech wasn't enough to put him over the top in the event's two straw polls, one held in person and the other online. As with so many of these conservative straw polls, the winner of the online vote was Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), who also spoke at the event. But winning the in-person balloting was former Godfather pizza founder Herman Cain, who has become a regular on the tea party circuit. Tea partiers have long insisted that they aren't, as some in the media have suggested, a bunch of racists, so perhaps Cain offered them a chance to prove that there is a black man in politics they could vote for. (He got an enthusiastic response from the audience when he told stories of other African-Americans criticizing him for criticizing Obama: "Some black people can think for themselves," he declared.)

But more likely, Cain won their hearts with his tremendously funny political delivery, if not with his policy prescriptions. Cain, most recently working as a motivational speaker, riled up the crowd with talk of American exceptionalism and Gipper references. But his solutions for the nation's most urgent problems were vague, thin, and hardly original. They were essentially the fantasy of any corporate executive. He called for lowering the tax rate from 35 to 25 percent and for reducing capital gains taxes to zero. "These are not rocket science ideas," he noted.

Still, even with that thin gruel, Cain cleanly trounced both Pawlenty and Sarah Palin (who endorsed the summit but didn't attend), suggesting that tea partiers would prefer an outsider in the White House to any of the current contenders. But given that their leading preferences are Cain and Paul (a candidate whose prospects were roundly dissed by none other than Donald Trump last month), you do have to wonder how much impact the tea party may ultimately have on the 2012 election. A Cain/Paul ticket has about as much chance of winning the election as a Democratic one headed by Michael Moore and Alan Grayson. Anyway, check out Cain's speech to see the man for yourself:

 

Source: http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/02/ron-paul-and-herman-cain-tea-party-2012-dream-team

Ehrinn Cummings Sienna Miller Cindy Taylor Halle Berry Catherine Bell

Many Islams

A few days ago, the Assyrian International News Agency reported that Egyptian armed forces attacked a monastery outside of Cairo, wounding two monks and other Coptic workers. Terry Mattingly bemoans the dearth of media coverage: It is crucial, at this...


Email this Article Add to digg Add to Reddit Add to Twitter Add to del.icio.us Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andrewsullivan/rApM/~3/mcsrTkGKq44/click.phdo

Leighton Meester Dominique Swain Jamie Chung Alicia Witt Radha Mitchell

New band of the day ? No 975: King Jacks

This prince charming's ambitious pop reminds us of the brash, brilliantly bolshy quality of Adam Ant

Hometown: Enfield.

The lineup: Richard Forbes (vocals, piano, drums and guitar).

The background: We're not saying we've got a varied and interesting job or anything, but one day last week we interviewed Adam Ant in the morning, then spent the afternoon at Goldie's house. How amazing would it be to follow that sentence by proclaiming that today's new act is a cross between Adam Ant and Goldie? Really amazing, right?

Well, he's not. But he does have something of Adam Ant about him. Not that he brandishes firearms in public places or anything, but he does sport a military jacket on the cover of his new single that vaguely resembles the one that Adam was inspired to wear circa Kings of the Wild Frontier after seeing David Hemmings in the 1968 film The Charge of the Light Brigade. And his songs, or at least some of them anyway, have a modicum of the brash, brilliantly bolshy quality of the best Ant music.

A modicum, we said. Heroes, the new single by King Jacks ? who used to be a four-piece but have now slimmed down to just multi-instrumentalist songwriter Richard Forbes ? is nowhere near as good as something like Prince Charming (not that there is anything like Prince Charming), but listening to those handclaps, the big, bold drums, the twangy guitar and the way Forbes's voice is treated to make it sound like a small army, we can't help being reminded of the glory that was 1981-2 Adam Ant.

Forbes has produced and self-funded a whole album of this stuff. It's called Please Everyone, Please Yourself and, using money earned from teaching in hs spare time, he has amassed the necessary equipment ? MacBook Pro, Fender Telecaster, Roland Juno, drums, Fender Jazz Bass ? to make a Burundi-ish racket, all on his own. Think Adam, but also the early-70s glam blockbusters of Chinn-Chapman. King Jacks hasn't quite managed anything as awesomely bonkers as Stand and Deliver or Ballroom Blitz on the album ? most of it veers closer to Kaiser Chiefs ? but he's getting there, if indeed Forbes has a future beyond the meagre rewards afforded by an appreciated cult debut.

Still, you've got to applaud his effort, even as we bemoan the fact that we're praising someone for being a fraction as incredible as an artist from 30 years ago. The ambition is clearly there. He's even got this ongoing plan ? Project e11even ? that involves roping in different directors to make a video for each of the 11 tracks on his album; he then intends to get 11 remixers to each remix a song, and there will be an 11-date tour.

The video idea is interesting ? he wants each director to use a different format to film on, and each will be paid a denomination of 11 starting at 11 pence up to 11 grand, "based on the complexity of the video and format". The first one, for Heroes, stars rent-a-hardnut Danny Dyer who in the story arranges for a bunch of heavies to meet in some abandoned estate that you think will play host to a ruck, but in fact turns out to be for a rave. It's not exactly Diana Dors dressed as a fairy godmother, but it's a start.

The buzz: "He's a diamond" ? the people of Enfield.

The truth: Ridicule is nothing to be scared of.

Most likely to: Paint a white stripe across his nose.

Least likely to: Chuck a car alternator through a pub window.

What to buy: Heroes is released on 21 March, followed by the album.

File next to: Joboxers, Adam Ant, the Sweet, Kaiser Chiefs.

Links: kingjacks.com.

Tuesday's new band: Dark Dark Dark.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/feb/28/new-band-king-jacks

Bianca Kajlich Giulianna Ramirez Ashley Greene April Scott Mia Kirshner

Weekly Address: "Investments in Education, Innovation, and Infrastructure are an Essential Down Payment on our Future"

Release Time: 
For Immediate Release

WASHINGTON – In this week’s address, President Obama said that he expects Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress to find common ground as Congress focuses on a short term budget next week.  The President will consider any serious ideas to reduce the deficit, regardless of which party proposes them.  In fact, the President has already proposed freezing domestic spending, which would cut the deficit by $400 billion and bring this kind of spending to the lowest level, as a percentage of our economy, since the Eisenhower administration.  But, cutting investments in education and innovation would hinder our ability to out-compete the rest of the world.  While the President recognizes that everyone needs to be willing to sacrifice, we cannot sacrifice our country’s ability to win the future.

The audio and video of the address will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 a.m. ET, Saturday, February 26, 2011.

Remarks of President Barack Obama
As Prepared for Delivery
February 26, 2011
Washington, DC

Over the last month, I’ve been traveling the country, talking to Americans about how we can out-educate, out-innovate, and out-build the rest of the world. Doing that will require a government that lives within its means, and cuts whatever spending we can afford to do without.  But it will also require investing in our nation’s future – training and educating our workers; increasing our commitment to research and technology; building new roads and bridges, high-speed rail and high-speed internet.
 
In cities and towns throughout America, I’ve seen the benefits of these investments.  The schools and colleges of Oregon are providing Intel – the state’s largest private employer – with a steady stream of highly-educated workers and engineers.  At Parkville Middle School outside of Baltimore, engineering is the most popular subject, thanks to outstanding teachers who are inspiring students to focus on their math and science skills.
 
In Wisconsin, a company called Orion is putting hundreds of people to work manufacturing energy-efficient lights in a once-shuttered plant.  And in the small community of Marquette, in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, widely accessible high-speed internet has allowed students and entrepreneurs to connect to the global economy.  One small business, a third-generation, family-owned clothing shop called Getz’s is now selling their products online, which has helped them double their workforce and make them one of America’s 5,000 fastest-growing companies in a recent listing.
 
Each of these places reminds us that investments in education, innovation, and infrastructure are an essential down payment on our future. But they also remind us that the only way we can afford these investments is by getting our fiscal house in order.  Just like any family, we have to live within our means to make room for things we absolutely need.
 
That’s why I’ve called for a freeze on annual domestic spending over the next five years – a freeze that would cut the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, bringing this kind of spending to its lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was President. Just to be clear, that’s lower than it was under the past three administrations, and lower than it was under Ronald Reagan.
 
Now, putting this budget freeze in place will require tough choices. That’s why I’ve frozen salaries for hardworking civil servants for three years, and proposed cutting programs I care about deeply, like community action programs in low-income neighborhoods. I’m not taking these steps lightly – but I’m taking them because our economic future demands it.
 
Still, a freeze in annual domestic spending is just a start. If we’re serious about tackling our long-run fiscal challenges, we also need to cut excessive spending wherever we find it – in defense spending, spending in Medicare and Medicaid, and spending through tax breaks and loopholes.
 
I’m willing to consider any serious ideas to help us reduce the deficit – no matter what party is proposing them. But instead of cutting the investments in education and innovation we need to out-compete the rest of the world, we need a balanced approach to deficit reduction. We all need to be willing to sacrifice, but we can’t sacrifice our future.
 
Next week, Congress will focus on a short-term budget. For the sake of our people and our economy, we cannot allow gridlock to prevail. Both Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and Senate have said they believe it’s important to keep the government running while we work together on a plan to reduce our long-term deficit.
 
Given that, I urge and expect them to find common ground so we can accelerate, not impede, economic growth. It won’t be easy. There will be plenty of debates and disagreements, and neither party will get everything it wants. Both sides will have to compromise.
 
That’s what it will take to do what’s right for our country. And I look forward to working with members of both parties to produce a responsible budget that cuts what we can’t afford, sharpens America’s competitive edge in the world, and helps us win the future. Thanks everyone, and have a nice weekend.

Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/26/weekly-address-investments-education-innovation-and-infrastructure-are-e

Olivia Munn Melissa Sagemiller Roselyn Sanchez Soft Cell Beyoncé

Quote For The Day

?I don?t have any enthusiasm for?trying to shrink the relative importance of the financial system in our economy as a test of reform, because we have to think about the fact that we operate in the broader world?It?s the same...


Email this Article Add to digg Add to Reddit Add to Twitter Add to del.icio.us Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andrewsullivan/rApM/~3/8xelNUrB6jk/click.phdo

Raquel Alessi Marisa Coughlan Shanna Moakler Portia de Rossi Jolene Blalock

Fear vs Hope In The Arab 1848

Niall Ferguson fears the Middle Eastern revolutions: The people who made the American Revolution were, by 18th-century standards, exceptionally well-off and well-educated. People in Libya today are closer to the sans-culottes of the Paris back streets, the lumpenproletariat of the...


Email this Article Add to digg Add to Reddit Add to Twitter Add to del.icio.us Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andrewsullivan/rApM/~3/THSJAhcPD5Q/click.phdo

Kim Kardashian China Chow Alecia Elliott Kat Von D Ana Paula Lemes

Proving It

Brian Christian's piece has a great premise: In two hours, I will sit down at a computer and have a series of five-minute instant-message chats with several strangers. At the other end of these chats will be a psychologist, a...


Email this Article Add to digg Add to Reddit Add to Twitter Add to del.icio.us Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andrewsullivan/rApM/~3/yhnKGHimBsk/click.phdo

Shakara Ledard Vanessa Marcil Rachel McAdams Kristin Cavallari Brittany Murphy